[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]

he is rich? He will perhaps eat less than what you eat. These
are confusions in the mind. Wealth and possession 
accretion of objects, imagination that one has everything in
this world   I am the ruler of this earth  these are rank
illusions in the mind, and you will know this when the time
comes. When everything goes, you will realise that you made
a mistake in thinking that you had everything. You never
brought anything when you came to this world. Are you
trying to possess things which you did not bring? How did
you earn this property of the world when you did not bring it
with you when you came? Actually, if you have earned this
property, you could take it when you go. Why do you not take
it with you? You have so much wealth that you have earned
through your profession; take it with you when you go. Can
you? If you cannot bring anything and if you cannot take
anything either, how is it possible for you to possess
anything in the middle? The logic is: that which is not in the
beginning, and not in the end, is also not in the middle. It is a
total delusion, which is hard to understand and difficult to
63
appreciate. A bitter pill is this knowledge. But this is the
truth, and this is what the first mantra of the Isavasya
Upanishad says.
I have told you there are four instructions in this
Upanishad. The first one is the fundamental, philosophical
doctrine  the basic philosophy, not merely of this country,
but of humanity as a whole. It is possible to thrust all
religions into this one single verse of the Upanishad, i.e., the
first verse  isavasyam idam sarvam& , as one can thrust
things into a hold-all. All philosophies, all religions, all
doctrines go into the hold-all of this one verse of the Isavasya
Upanishad. Well, that is wonderful. This is the metaphysical
foundation of philosophy and the highest peak of human
thought.
The second mantra says:  Everyone has to do
something. Knowledge of the Supreme Being does not mean
idleness of personality. This is something even more difficult
to understand than the earlier mantra. You will say:  If God
alone is, why should I do anything? I will keep quiet. Here, in
saying so, you make the mistake of having a wrong notion
about yourself.  I will keep quiet. Which  I is keeping quiet?
Is the body  I keeping quiet? Is the mind  I keeping quiet?
What is meant when you say:  I shall keep quiet because God
does all things and He is all things ? It is a consciousness of a
peculiar condition of your personality that makes this
statement. Here you have made a blunder. Your statement
that you need not do anything implies your acceptance of
your being an individual nevertheless, a body-mind complex,
in spite of your theoretical and intellectual acceptance of the
omnipresence of God. This is something very interesting,
which may also look very difficult; but if you remember this,
you may not have to learn anything else afterwards.
It is a wrong notion of yourself that makes you conclude
that one can keep quiet without doing anything because God
does all things. Then how do you come into existence as an
idle person, if God exists everywhere and God is all things?
64
Do you believe that you have also negated yourself, and your
existence is abolished? If you really feel that God exists and
He is all things, it is wonderful. If you are convinced that you
do not exist and you have melted into the Cosmic Being, why
should you feel the need to say that you need not do
anything? In making this statement, you have made a mistake
due to a wrong concept of your individuality that has crept
in, even as you appear to be making a correct statement from
your point of view.
The concept of the Absolute is the subject of the first
mantra. The concept of individuality is the subject of the
second mantra. What are you, in the light of this conclusion
that God pervades all things and God is everything? If you are
cautious enough in exercising your thoughts in this context,
you will be compelled to conclude  and feel, too  that you
cannot exist at all. You do not any more exist. It has gone.
Your so-called  me has gone into the Universal  I . Such a
feeling, intellectually, is appreciable and conceivable.
Practically, you cannot accommodate yourself to this
consciousness because you can feel this hard body when you
touch it with your fingers. So the Upanishad says:  Do not be
in a hurry. Go slowly. Do such things as will gradually widen
the concept of your personality, or individuality, and make it
commensurate with the supreme universal personality of
God Himself. This is done by the duty which is to be
performed.
Yesterday I made a brief reference to the concept of duty.
Duty is the work that you do in participation with a larger
whole  an organisation, a family circumstance, a national
setup or even the universe itself. Actually, work in a spiritual
sense is not something that is done in some way, for some
reason.  I am doing something  that is not the point. The
work that you do as a duty becomes valuable  and actually
can be called duty and as work that has that a value in it 
only if it is a sacrifice on your part by way of a participation
in the welfare of a larger whole to which you belong. If you
65
are in a family with five people, ten people, each member has
to contribute something by way of a sacrifice of his personal
interest for the welfare of a larger organisation, which is the
group of individuals called the family. If each one sticks to his
own guns, there will be no family. It will disintegrate. A
family is a consciousness; it is not a bundle of people. It is an
awareness of oneself belonging to a total whole, which is
what is called a family. It is a conceptual entity, not a physical
body. So is an organisation; so is a nation. You cannot see the
nation with your eyes. You see only mountains, rivers, trees
and the ground. Nation is a concept, a consciousness of a
totality of values to which you belong as a citizen thereof.
When you say,  I am a citizen of this country, what is it that
you actually mean? You are a citizen; it means you are a
person, an entity that belongs to a total whole, which is not
visible to the eyes. You have to participate in the welfare of
the whole.
There are various wholes. The body itself is a whole. You
have to take care of it, not torture it and kill it. The body also
is an organism; it is an organisation. The family is an
organism, an organisation. So is a state, a nation, an
international setup, the United Nations organisation or the
whole universe of creation. In each one, in each level, you
have to be a participant and not be in opposition. You should
not belong to the opposite party always. You should be a
participant in the welfare of the whole to which you belong.
This is the duty that you have to perform. Do work as long as
you are alive in this world. There is no retirement from work
of this kind. There may be retirement from office work, from
industrial work and so on, but there is no retirement from
duty because you retire from duty only when you cease to
exist as an individual. As long as personality persists, duty
continues. You may live for a hundred years, if possible 
satam jivema. What will you do for one hundred years? You
will be doing duty. What is the duty?
66
A person who has not understood the meaning of the
first mantra will not understand the meaning of the second
mantra either. They go together as associates, like the right
hand and the left hand. You will not be able to understand
what duty is, in the sense of this self-sacrifice for the welfare [ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
  • zanotowane.pl
  • doc.pisz.pl
  • pdf.pisz.pl
  • dudi.htw.pl
  • Linki
    Powered by wordpress | Theme: simpletex | © To, co się robi w łóżku, nigdy nie jest niemoralne, jeśli przyczynia się do utrwalenia miłości.